LATEST ARTICLE

6/recent/ticker-posts

Why General Learning Beats Specialization

Why General Learning Beats Specialization

when you look more more deeply uh they're not as clearcut as we tend to think well I I learned this myself when

I I didn't know this as as the rule but I I found the story of lomachenko

because I I my friend of mine brought me ringside to a fight in New York City and I sat at the side of the Ring watching this guy called Vil lenko that I'd never

seen in my life and I just couldn't believe his footwork I'd never seen

anything like it in my life and then I after the fight he won the fight of course after the fight I looked into his

win record and it was something like he'd won 300 of his amateur fights and only ever lost one and then he' gone back and beat the guy that he had lost

against um and in my mind I'd never seen a boxer like it ever and then when I read into your work you've mentioned him

as well as being one of these examples that had a really varied early upbringing didn't just focus on boxing

and that's ultimately what made his skill stack so unusual and therefore probably what made him the best his

story surprised even me where he took several years off to learn dance like d i mean I wouldn't

usually expect someone to take years off it's just sort of do things in those same years so that was amazing but his

father's called Anatoli and I think it was his father that took him off into Yeah dance classes or something and then

let him go back to boxing so for your perspective child I wouldn't say like don't expose them to soccer I think

because I think a lot of this is I think there's there's a few things going there are three buckets of things going on

with why this delayed specialization Works in sports one is match quality again the degree of fit between who you

are and what you do is that about passion like what you're passionate about ability and interests both and the

earlier you force selection the more likely you put the wrong person in the wrong spot so especially when selection is way pre puberty okay you're probably

putting people in the wrong my kid might want to be a boxer but I'm forcing him to be a soccer player and he might miss

his potential with boxing premature optimization yeah okay and and that's also why we often see on junior teams

the relative age effect you know where kids born earlier in their Birth Cohort are way over represented on Junior and

youth national teams because when they're eight or whatever and selected if they're eight and 10 months versus

just turned eight that's a huge difference of development in that age and coaches mistake that biological maturation for talent and so youth teams

are overloaded with kids born early in their youth cohort and also in school especially boys if they're younger in

their age C are much more likely to get diagnosed with ahd but they're just acting like the younger boys that they

are um okay and so and then that disappears at the top level so it's not it's not a good thing so there's the

relative age effect that's one or premature you know choosing there's injury which is we now see a lot of

adult style overuse injuries in kids and the main predictor of that is nine months a year of one sport and one sport

only so this isn't about less Sports there seems to be a protective effect of diversifying that is separate from just

doing less but actually you know balancing yourself out in some way but then there's a skill learning Advantage

where it's similar to language where you know kids who grow up in a like with multiple languages they will often show

a little delay in some of their language skills but that delay is totally wiped out in the long run and they have an advantage for subsequently learning

other languages looks very similar in a lot of these skills where if you're diversifying there may be some delay but

you have an advantage for picking up other skills later on and I don't think this is about whether you're putting on a basketball jersey or a football jersey

I think it's about variability in your problem solving which is why I think so many of the great footballers grew up on

fotsa where what's foots it's foot's with a small ball soccer like game with a small ball um I think I think the the

Brazilian name is like football day Salo which it means like football in a room small ball stays on the ground played in

a small space and kids will be playing on you know cobblestones one day and concrete the next day and and it's like

in a phone booth you know at hypers speed and so there's no no one's drifting down the field and everyone's

having to judge even if you don't have the ball pick up on body movements to try to anticipate what's coming next and the

touches are about six times as frequent uh as in as in full scale football and so I think it engenders a lot more of

this sort of variability um than does just sort of the full scale game it makes your

reactions a lot faster as well you have to make decisions faster with the ball but under yeah it's funny when you're talking about the tiger example and why

people um broadcast that story more than they broadcast what you consider to be

the the average which is just people having this varied upbringing and then eventually finding one thing and taking it forward it made me think that from my

The Risks Of Specializing Too Early

experience people broadcast that they basically broadcast anything that's the exception because it's the exception so

the story of you know tiger WS as one example but the on the other side with

someone like Anthony Joshua who started boxing at I'm going to Butch of this but let's say

24 I hear that all the time because it's so unusual that he would become world

champion but start at 24 and the other story that you hear all the time is like the child prodigy story of like I don't

know Michael Jackson or Tiger Woods that started when they were two you don't hear about the person that starts at like 15 right because it's not

interesting right because it's the norm right or who ramps up in sort of a normal way if they started because early

exposure is great yeah early exposure is good but yeah and and it's a little it's a little more equivocal right it's a

it's less of a prescription also like so when when someone starts late we think they defied the odds this is amazing and

when someone starts early that's a very easy example to emulate and so I think a

lot of it is about that ease we referenced the word match quality but also we talked about passion a little

bit which kind of is one factor of match quality a lot of people are trying to figure out what they should be aiming at

in their life and they one of the most popular questions I get from young people is um how do I find my passion

how do I know what it is or at least like what's the process def finding it and it's they refer to it as if it's this sort of Easter egg that one of them

and have to find it there's not one and it's singular passion is a singular word yeah no I don't I first of all I think

losing the idea that it is sing I mean that's like the idea that there's like a single soulmate out there for you you

know and I mean obviously I found my single soulmate but for most of the rest of

you uh there's a lot of things you might be interested in in

fact the more things you try you'll probably figure out the more things that that you're interested in I was just I

was just like last week spending a little time I was at the Pentagon spending uh some time with a lieutenant

general who helped with a program they call talent-based branching there where they were losing a lot of their the

people they identified as The Highest Potential were leaving the the Army and they started this pilot program called

talent-based branching where instead of saying here's your path you know here's your your career path get uper out

they'd pair them with sort of a coach like figure and they'd have them dabble in like five different career paths a little bit reflect on it with their

coach take some tests how this fits you they have to keep track of the Reflections in online portal again self-regulatory learning got to do it

explicitly and in that process 90% of the army Cadets who went through

that process changed their career preference 90 and this is just from a little bit of dabbling because you don't

know what's out there you don't know what the opportunities are and that and you know it helped retention so people

were more likely to stay if they find better fit this is I think actually one of the really important things about um and I'll I'll Circle back back

to Passion a little bit there but when we think about grit right which everyone

thinks of is I think about this and the reason that the Army made me think about it my semantic network is that the most

famous grit research was done at West Point at the United States military academy by Angela Duckworth and her colleagues and it found that the grit

survey the grit survey is a 12 question survey half the points are awarded for consistency of interests not changing

what you're interested in and half the points for Persistence of effort or perseverance turns out to be a good

predictor of who would get through this very rigorous orientation at West Point called Beast also has some predictive value for

who would graduate so just to give you some context for the listeners that from the way that I understood this is that

Angela Duckworth did this study to basically figure out what it was that made people more likely to get through this very rigorous selection process at

an army barracks or something and she determined that this this grit as she she called it was the thing that allowed

people to be successful so from that study I've heard this all over the place that actually what makes people successful even in my team is great yeah

yeah and that survey turned out to be a better predictor than were some traditional metrics of who would get through Beast like test scores and stuff

like that it also had some value for who would get through the military academy

as did some of those traditional metrics but tons of those like since about the mid1 1990s those very gritty

cadets at West Point have been almost half of them have been quitting almost on the day that they allow they have a 5-year active duty service commitment

after they graduate and almost half of them have been quitting and so the army at a certain point said oh we've got a

millennial grit problem you know like too much avocado toast not enough mortgages or like

whatever and then some scientists who also officers decided to study the problem and they said we don't we

haven't gotten a grit problem overnight we've got a match quality problem right

when the Army looked like the rest of the economy where it was more upper out and you fac the same kind of problems

year-over-year and you could have a period of training followed by a period of working doing similar things lateral Mobility was limited

that was fine it just mimicked the rest of the economy then you move into this whatever you want to call it knowledge creativity information economy and

people who can engage in Creative problem solving and knowledge creation have tremendous lad Mobility they have lots of opportunities these young people

are learning things about themselves in the early 20s and they have no agency over career switching to match it so they were just quitting right when the

Army first didn't realize this so they threw retention bonuses at people and the ones were going to stay

took it ones are goingon to leave left anyway half billion dollars taxpayer money didn't didn't uh fix the problem

but what I think it shows is that how limited your insight into what you might want to do is based on the things

Post a Comment

0 Comments